Projekt badawczy Polska-Namibia 2010
Manchester United Official History 1878-2002
produkcja: Wielka Brytania gatunek: Dokumentalny , Sportowy
data premiery: 2002-10-21 (Świat)
czas trwania: 170
"Manchester United Football Club started life as Newton Heath, a team founded by workers from the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway in 1878. This is where
this program starts, recounting the history of Manchester United. Honors soon followed and the first of seven First Division titles was won in 1908. With an FA Cup win the following year, and another league title two years later, Manchester United were firmly establishing themselves as a force in English football. The era of great success and tragedy under the inspirational management of Sir Matt Busby and the Busby Babes. Charlton, Best and Law won the European Cup. Sir Alex Ferguson built the team of the nineties that have gone on to win seven premiership titles over the last ten years. Built around home-grown talent and inspirational signings (such as Eric Cantona), Manchester United moved into an era of unrivalled success which culminated in the remarkable treble of 1999. But Manchester United's history does! not stop there. Further championships followed in both 2000 and 2001 and this program finishes at a time when Ferguson, through the signings of Ruud van Nistelrooy, Juan Sebastian Veron and Rio Ferdinand is building another team worthy of success at home and in Europe."
Links:
CD1
CD 2
No pass...
More info :
http://www.amazon.com/Manchester-United-Official-History-1878-2002/dp/B0000BV0TX
Enjoy Man Utd Fans
from official Liverpool website:
CHRIS Kirkland is the unluckiest goalkeeper in the Premiership.
Only one stopper in the league is better and he just happens to be at the same
club. That hasn't stopped the deputy's fanbase increasing on a weekly basis.
Kirkland will discover more allies backing his cause and although he'll welcome
the praise - which is fully deserved - the motives of some of his most vocal
benefactors aren't as honourable as you'd imagine.
With all due respect to Kirkland, few Liverpool supporters really believe Jerzy
Dudek deserves to be dropped after the defeat to Fulham. The Pole should stay
in goal.
Deep down, Kirkland will feel the same. When he establishes himself as
Anfield's number one in the future, which he will, he'll be entitled to think
he's allowed two mistakes every 18 months, which is all Dudek has been guilty
of. But the glee with which certain sections of this country welcomed the
Pole's errors can be easily explained.
Dudek has enemies because he isn't English. He is not a contender to replace
David Seaman. He is therefore surplus to requirements in the eyes of those who
care far more about the national team than they do Liverpool.
Liverpool's wellbeing isn't on the agenda for the most passionate Kirkland
fans. England's is. Do we really believe anyone would care so much about
Dudek's form if an English deputy wasn't waiting in the wings? We know what to
expect over the next few weeks. Poor Jerzy will be in the firing line with
every detail of his game dissected.
His performances have earned him a halo in the eyes of Kopites. But when the
halo slips, it's only a few inches away from being a noose and that's where the
Dude's enemies intentions lie. Every mishandled cross, wayward kick or goal
against him will be used to tighten the rope around his neck. His impeccable
form since arriving from Feyenoord will fade into the distance, an irrelevance
to those who want a new England number one and see Seaman's rivals for the job
as the charlatansthey are.
An unofficial 'Kirkland in' campaign is well underway, and it's not
originating at Anfield. One hopes Gerard Houllier stands firm and ignores the
hype because replacing Dudek now will follow England's agenda, not Liverpool's.
Kirkland has time on his side. He is a monstrous talent and will soon by
Liverpool's and England's number one. But that time hasn't come yet.
_____________________________________________________
THE phrase 'Liverpool deserved at least a draw' has been used too much
recently. My match reports against Middlesbrough and Fulham included this
accurate reflection on the 90 minutes. Fulham never deserved to take a 2-0
lead, even if the Reds only had themselves to blame for the deficit.
As for the game at the Riverside, the tedium on offer was the biggest cure for
insomnia since the live coverage of the Big Brother house. Only an error would
create a goal, as was proved. But yes, Liverpool deserved a draw. Trouble is,
can Liverpool 'deserving a draw' be ever considered enough?
Surely if there is going to be any injustice in these games it's because
Liverpool deserved to emerge with three points. Victory was never on the agenda
on either occasion. So the next time you read about a draw being a fairer
outcome, don't take it as a piece of spin-doctoring softening the blow of
defeat. It means Liverpool aren't doing enough to win. And that will never be
enough for a team chasing the Premiership.